Naess, Lars Otto, Newell, Peter, Newsham, Andrew, Phillips, Jon, Quan, Julian ORCID: 0000-0003-2388-5684 and Tanner, Thomas (2015) Climate policy meets national development contexts: Insights from Kenya and Mozambique. Global Environmental Change Part A, 35. pp. 534-544. ISSN 0959-3780 (doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.015)

Preview

PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript) 15413 QUAN Climate_Policy_Meets_National_Development_2015.pdf - Accepted Version Download (683kB) | Preview

Abstract

Despite the growth in work linking climate change and national level development agendas, there has been limited attention to their political economy. These processes mediate the winners, losers and potential trade-offs between different goals, and the political and institutional factors which enable or inhibit integration across different policy areas. This paper applies a political economy analysis to case studies on low carbon energy in Kenya and carbon forestry in Mozambique. In examining the intersection of climate and development policy, we demonstrate the critical importance of politics, power and interests when climate-motivated initiatives encounter wider and more complex national policy contexts, which strongly influence the prospects of achieving integrated climate policy and development goals in practice. We advance the following arguments: First, understanding both the informal nature and historical embeddedness of decision making around key issue areas and resource sectors of relevance to climate change policy is vital to engaging actually existing politics; why actors hold the positions they do and how they make decisions in practice. Second, we need to understand and engage with the interests, power relations and policy networks that will shape the prospects of realising climate policy goals; acting as barriers in some cases and as vehicles for change in others. Third, by looking at the ways in which common global drivers have very different impacts upon climate change policy once refracted through national levels institutions and policy processes, it is easier to understand the potential and limits of translating global policy into local practice. And fourth, climate change and development outcomes, and the associated trade-offs, look very different depending on how they are framed, who frames them and in which actor coalitions. Understanding these can inform the levers of change and power to be navigated, and with whom to engage in order to address climate change and development goals.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Climate change, Development policy, Mozambique, Kenya, Low carbon energy, carbon Forestry, Political economy.
Subjects:	G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Development Studies Research Group
Last Modified:	21 Oct 2020 10:13
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/15413

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads