Pawlowski, Mark ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5473-5809 (2009) Personal and proprietary tenancies. Property Law Journal, 234. pp. 19-21. ISSN 1461-0752

Preview

PDF (Published version made available here with the permission of the publisher.) Pawlowski_PLJ234_p19-21_(2).pdf - Published Version Download (513kB)

Abstract

Examines the Chancery Division ruling in London Development Agency v Nidai on whether a number of agreements providing for the construction of a bridge and shop premises on the retaining walls of a river resulted in a binding legal lease or a series of bare licences. Comments on the failure of the judgment to mention the House of Lords ruling in Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust and discusses whether a Bruton tenancy is capable of binding third parties.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Published version made available here with the permission of the publisher.
Uncontrolled Keywords:	agreements, business tenancies, licences, proprietary interests, rivers, shops, third parties,
Subjects:	K Law > KD England and Wales H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Pre-2014 Departments:	School of Humanities & Social Sciences School of Humanities & Social Sciences > Department of Law & Criminology School of Humanities & Social Sciences > Law & Criminology Research Group
Related URLs:	Organisation Publisher
Last Modified:	02 Oct 2019 14:37
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/1431

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads