Study with Greenwich  | Student Information  | About Us  | Research  | Contact Us

About GALA

Browse Contents

Guide to Depositing in GALA

For Greenwich Depositing Authors

Quick Search on GALA

Advanced Search

Search the University website

We know where the shoe pinches:1 A case studybased analysis of the social benefits of pesticides

Bennett, Ben, Cooper, Jerry and Dobson, Hans (2010) We know where the shoe pinches:1 A case studybased analysis of the social benefits of pesticides. Outlook on Agriculture, 39 (2). pp. 79-87. ISSN 0030 7270

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/000000010791745420

Abstract

Most published material relating to pesticides focuses on negative effects. Previous work by the authors has linked pesticides to a range of benefits, but not to wider social outcomes. In this study, a case is made that, if used properly, pesticides can result in a range of social benefits. To characterize social outcomes for individuals, families, other groups and communities, the authors undertook the development of an analytical framework to categorize the potential outcomes, a review of the literature and an examination of specific cases in production systems using pesticides. Four categories of use were explored: livestock disease vector control, subsistence farming, transition from subsistence to cash crop farming and commercial farming. The last two showed very strong positive associations, with benefits being manifested in increased income and reduced risk, plus the ability to hire labour and provide employment opportunities. Other outcomes were the evolution of more complex community facilities, such as schools and shops, and improved health. One unexpected finding was that there appeared to be an association between the use of pesticides and cooperation (that is, farmers working together in purchasing, spraying and/or marketing). Many of the case studies supported the hypothesis that farm businesses using pesticides were associated with the development of administrative skills that spilled over into other aspects of people's lives. Although the sample was small and there was a risk of an inherent bias towards those with a vested interest in maintaining their current farming systems (including pesticides), these case studies support the authors' hypothesis that there are social benefits from pesticide use.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: pesticides, benefits, social benefits, case studies
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
School / Department / Research Groups: Natural Resources Institute
Natural Resources Institute > Agriculture, Health & Environment
Related URLs:
Last Modified: 01 Mar 2012 09:59
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/7692

Actions (login required)

View Item