Skip navigation

Understanding Kant’s architectonic method in the critique of pure reason and its role in the work of Gilles Deleuze

Understanding Kant’s architectonic method in the critique of pure reason and its role in the work of Gilles Deleuze

Warning

Notice of Repository Upgrade

Greenwich Academic Literature Archive will be being upgraded between 16:00 18th February and 10:00 20th February. During this time user login will be disabled but publications will still be accessible for download, except for one or two brief periods.

We apologise for any inconvenience. Please contact gala@gre.ac.uk for more information.

Willatt, Edward (2009) Understanding Kant’s architectonic method in the critique of pure reason and its role in the work of Gilles Deleuze. PhD thesis, University of Greenwich.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Pages containing signatures redacted)
Edward J. Willatt 2009 - redacted.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (8MB) | Preview

Abstract

How we read Kant's Critique of Pure Reason has a huge influence on how convincing we find the parts of which it is composed. This thesis will argue that by taking its arguments and concepts in isolation we neglect the unifying architectonic method that Kant employed. Understanding this text as a response to a single problem, that of the possibility of synthetic a priori judgement, will allow us to evaluate it more fully. We will explore Kant's attempts to relate the a priori and the synthetic in the Introduction, Metaphysical Deduction and Analytic of Principles of the Critique of Pure Reason. Having developed this reading at length we will be able to reassess Kant's relation to the work of Gilles Deleuze. Deleuze's critique of Kant and his tendency to make selective use of his work has so far characterised their relations. However, by reading Kant's Critique of Pure Reason in terms of its unifying method we will open up a new means of relating these two thinkers. Whilst Deleuze rejects many key Kantian concerns and concepts he embraces his methodological concern with the ability of problems to unify our thought. The problem-setting and forms of argument that emerge within Kant's architectonic method will be related to Deleuze's account of experience. This thesis will contribute to both Kant and Deleuze studies on the basis of the reading of the Critique of Pure Reason it will present. By showing how Kant's text is to be read as a whole we will be able to challenge the conclusion that the arguments he makes ultimately rely upon a notion of 'subjective origin'. The problem of accounting for 'the actual' through its relation to 'the virtual' in Deleuze's thought will be re-assessed on the basis of his newly established relation with Kant. Understanding Kant's method in the Critique of Pure Reason will be shown to strengthen both his own account of experience and that offered by Deleuze.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Additional Information: uk.bl.ethos.550195
Uncontrolled Keywords: Immanuel Kant, Gilles Deleuze, philosophy, architectonic system, pure reason,
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Pre-2014 Departments: School of Humanities & Social Sciences
School of Humanities & Social Sciences > Creative, Critical & Communication Studies
Last Modified: 10 Jan 2019 17:17
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/5652

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics