Nelson, Valerie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1075-0238 and Martin, Adrienne ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9305-7302 (2015) Fairtrade international’s multi-dimensional impacts in Africa. In: Raynolds, Laura T and Bennett, Elizabeth A., (eds.) Handbook of Research on Fair Trade. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 509-531. ISBN 9781783474608 (doi:10.4337/9781783474622.00040)

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

In this chapter we use emerging empirical evidence on the impact of Fairtrade, drawing on studies by the authors and other researchers. Combined, these studies provide a much stronger evidence base than has been previously available. We have extracted the findings on Fairtrade International impact in Africa from multi-region studies. We consider primarily the impacts for producers and workers, but also the implications at an organizational level. We identify the key factors which determine Fairtrade’s impact in different contexts. We argue that the evidence shows that there are many positive benefits generated by Fairtrade, but there are questions arising from a development perspective and a need for new Fairtrade strategies and innovation. Until recently there has been little evidence on Fairtrade’s impact in Africa. A meta-review found comparatively few studies focusing on regions beyond Latin America, commodities other than coffee, and some issues were neglected (e.g., gender and social difference, hired labor issues) (Nelson and Pound 2009). The relative efficacy of Fairtrade vis-à-vis other sustainability standards was not addressed and the studies had limited comparability and rigor. A series of studies has been published on Fairtrade impact since 2010, making a stronger evidence base including recent studies commissioned by Fairtrade organizations and donors. We analyze the findings of these studies after briefly discussing methodological challenges and issues. The Fairtrade commissioned studies are largely qualitative in nature and thus generally lack quantitative measurement of impacts and statistically controlled comparisons.

Item Type:	Book Section
Uncontrolled Keywords:	development studies, agricultural economics, development economics, development studies, economics and finance, agricultural economics, development economics, international economics, political economy, environment, agricultural economics, politics and public policy, human rights, political economy, regulation and governance
Subjects:	S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Engineering & Science Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Livelihoods & Institutions Department
Last Modified:	23 May 2020 21:09
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/13854

Actions (login required)

View Item