Skip navigation

High moisture extrusion of fava bean protein blend: evaluating potato protein as gluten replacement for texture enhancement

High moisture extrusion of fava bean protein blend: evaluating potato protein as gluten replacement for texture enhancement

Baeghbali, Vahid, Garlapati, Akash, Euston, Stephen R., Maklad, Osama ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6893-2654 and Acharya, Parag ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2521-9968 (2026) High moisture extrusion of fava bean protein blend: evaluating potato protein as gluten replacement for texture enhancement. Food Hydrocolloids, 181:113018. ISSN 0268-005X (Print), 1873-7137 (Online) (doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2026.113018)

[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
53801 ACHARYA_High_Moisture_Extrusion_Of_Fava_Bean_Protein_Blend_(AAM)_2026.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of VoR] PDF (VoR)
53801 ACHARYA_High_Moisture_Extrusion_Of_Fava_Bean_Protein_Blend_(VoR)_2026.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (9MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

High‑moisture extrusion (HME) enables fibrous structuring of plant proteins for meat analogues where wheat gluten (WG) remains a prevalent texture aid with allergenicity concerns. This study evaluated whether potato protein isolate (PPI) can be a gluten‑free structuring agent for texturizing fava bean protein isolate (FPI) during HME. FPI, FPI–WG, and FPI–PPI blends (75:25 w/w) were extruded and assessed for functional properties, colour, texture, nonlinear rheology, protein–protein interactions, microstructure, and taste profiling. The PPI increased specific mechanical energy relative to FPI and WG and produced co-extrudates with the highest surface hydrophobicity (11,824) and strongest intrinsic fluorescence quenching (68.3a.u.), indicating extensive unfolding and aggregation. When co-extrudate with FPI, WG lowered hardness and increased springiness compared to PPI. Both co-extrudates E(FPI-WG) and E(FPI-PPI) increased disulfide‑linked protein fractions (31–33%) relative to E(FPI) (21.8%), while E(FPI-PPI) exhibited the strongest nonlinear viscoelastic response. The study also elucidates the mechanistic underpinnings of gluten‑free texturization in E(FPI-PPI) demonstrating hybrid protein–protein network formation by PPI primarily through covalent interactions. Oil‑holding capacity of extrudate increased specifically with PPI (211.8%) compared to WG which is due to the combination of higher surface hydrophobicity and porous architecture of E(FPI-PPI). Overall, PPI formed a reinforced hybrid interaction network with FPI upon HME, supporting its viability as a gluten‑free structuring agent for fava‑based meat analogues. However, e-tongue based taste profiling revealed stronger bitterness and astringency with prolonged aftertastes in E(FPI-PPI) which underscores a formulation trade-off as PPI enhances network strength but necessitates bitterness mitigation strategies compared to WG.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: high‑moisture extrusion, fava (faba) bean protein, potato protein, wheat gluten, protein-protein interaction, disulfide crosslinking, LAOS, meat analogues.
Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General)
S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
S Agriculture > SB Plant culture
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Centre for Food Systems Research
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Centre for Food Systems Research > Food Processing & Innovation
Last Modified: 23 Jun 2026 12:39
URI: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/53801

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics