Skip navigation

The forensic restrictiveness questionnaire: development, validation, and revision

The forensic restrictiveness questionnaire: development, validation, and revision

Tomlin, Jack ORCID: 0000-0002-7610-7918, Birgit, Völlm, Vivek, Furtado, Vincent, Egan and Peter, Bartlett (2019) The forensic restrictiveness questionnaire: development, validation, and revision. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10:805. pp. 1-10. ISSN 1664-0640 (Online) (doi:

PDF (Publisher VoR)
38129_TOMLIN_The_forensic_restrictiveness_questionnaire.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (908kB) | Preview


Introduction: Forensic psychiatric care is often practiced in closed institutions. These highly regulated, secure, and prescriptive environments arguably reduce patient autonomy, self-expression, and personhood. Taken together these settings are restrictive as patients’ active participation in clinical, organizational, community, and personal life-worlds are curtailed. The consequences of patients’ experiences of restrictiveness have not been explored empirically. This study aimed to develop a psychometrically-valid measure of experiences of restrictiveness. This paper presents the development, validation, and revision of the Forensic Restrictiveness Questionnaire (FRQ).
Methods: In total, 235 patients recruited from low, medium, and high secure hospitals across England completed the FRQ. The dimensionality of the 56-item FRQ was tested using Principle Axis Factor Analysis and parallel analysis. Internal consistency was explored with Cronbach’s α. Ward climate (EssenCES) and quality of life (FQL-SV) questionnaires were completed by participants as indicators of convergent validity. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Cronbach’s α guided the removal of items that did not scale adequately.
Results: The analysis indicated good psychometric properties. EFA revealed a unidimensional structure, suggesting a single latent factor. Convergent validity was confirmed as the FRQ was significantly negatively correlated with quality of life (Spearman’s ρ = −0.72) and ward climate (Spearman’s ρ = −0.61). Internal consistency was strong (α = 0.93). Forty-one items were removed from the pilot FRQ. The data indicate that a final 15-item FRQ is a valid and internally reliable measure.
Conclusion: The FRQ offers a novel and helpful method for clinicians and researchers to measure and explore forensic patients’ experiences of restrictiveness within secure hospitals.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: forensic; mental health; restrictive; autonomy; FRQ; forensic restrictiveness questionnaire, psychometric
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
K Law > K Law (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA1001 Forensic Medicine. Medical jurisprudence. Legal medicine
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences > School of Law & Criminology (LAC)
Last Modified: 21 Feb 2023 11:05

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics