Skip navigation

Peer victimisation in early childhood; observations of participant roles and sex differences

Peer victimisation in early childhood; observations of participant roles and sex differences

Monks, Claire P. ORCID: 0000-0003-2638-181X, Smith, Peter K. and Kucaba, Kat (2021) Peer victimisation in early childhood; observations of participant roles and sex differences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (2):415. ISSN 1661-7827 (Print), 1660-4601 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020415)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Publisher's PDF - Open Access)
30913 KUCABA_Peer_Victimisation_In_Early_Childhood_(OA)_2021.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (359kB) | Preview

Abstract

During middle childhood and adolescence, victimisation appears to be a group process involving different participant roles. However, peer reports with younger children (four to six years old) have failed to identify the participant roles of assistant (to the bully) reinforcers or defenders with much reliability. This may be because peer victimisation is a more dyadic process among younger children (behavioural reality), or because of limitations in young children’s cognitive capacity to identify these behaviours (cognitive limitations). The findings of an observational study which examined the group nature of peer victimisation among young children are presented. Observations were made of 56 children aged four and five years using time sampling during free play at school (totalling 43.5 h of observation). Records were made of their behaviour when an onlooker witnessed aggression by others, and also of others’ behaviour when they were being aggressive or being victimised. Although children other than the aggressor and target were present in nearly two thirds of the episodes of peer victimisation observed, few exhibited behavioural responses in line with the assistant, reinforcer or defender roles. This supports the behavioural reality rather than the cognitive limitations explanation. Sex differences were observed in types of aggression displayed by children, with boys more likely than girls to be physically aggressive. Children were less likely to be aggressive to other-sex peers and were most likely to be victimised by children of the same sex as them. There were also sex differences in children’s onlooker behaviour. The implications for our understanding of the development of peer victimisation and bullying in children are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: victimisation, aggression, early childhood, observations
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Department of Psychology, Social Work & Counselling
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Vulnerable Children and Families
Last Modified: 24 Mar 2021 23:39
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
Selected for REF2021: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/30913

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics