Skip navigation

How design reviews work in architecture and fine art: a comparative study across one school of fine art and two schools of architecture

How design reviews work in architecture and fine art: a comparative study across one school of fine art and two schools of architecture

Marie, Jennifer and Grindle, Nick (2014) How design reviews work in architecture and fine art: a comparative study across one school of fine art and two schools of architecture. Charrette, 1 (1). pp. 36-48. ISSN 2054-6718

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

This paper compares student design reviews in Fine Art and Architecture degrees. We describe the ways that reviews run in each subject, identify salient points of difference, and make suggestions for further developing design reviews. We found that 'crit' sessions in both fields reveal tensions between their dual functions of judgment and teaching. We think that this is better resolved in Fine Art because the hierarchy of expertise is less evident, and that teachers in Architecture could consider separating the two functions. We observed high quality feedback on the content of design projects and we suggest ways of further supporting the learning outcomes of listening, presenting, participating in the disciplinary dialogue, and justifying work created intuitively. We also discuss the range of language used to denote design reviews and how these emphasize different aspects of the review's purposes to students and their reviewers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: crits, judgment, feedback, participation, threshold concepts
Subjects: N Fine Arts > NA Architecture
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Educational Development Unit
Last Modified: 03 Feb 2021 13:38
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
Selected for REF2021: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/30605

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item