Skip navigation

Analyzing procedural equity in government-led community-based forest management

Analyzing procedural equity in government-led community-based forest management

Friedman, Rachel S., Rhodes, Jonathan R., Dean, Angela J., Law, Elizabeth A., Santika, Truly ORCID: 0000-0002-3125-9467, Budiharta, Sugeng, Hutabarat, Joseph A., Indrawan, Tito P., Kusworo, Ahmad, Meijaard, Erik, St. John, Freya A.V., Struebig, Matthew J. and Wilson, Kerrie A. (2020) Analyzing procedural equity in government-led community-based forest management. Ecology and Society, 25 (3):16. ISSN 1708-3087 (doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11710-250316)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
29593 SANTIKA_Analyzing_Procedural_Equity_In_Government-led_Community-based_Forest_Management_(OA)_2020.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Participatory approaches to forest management have been promoted as a means of returning rights historically removed, and as a way of managing natural resources sustainably, fairly, and to improve livelihoods in communities. Top-down models of community-based forest management take the perspective that if people feel ownership over, have a voice in decisions about, and can benefit from surrounding ecosystems, then they will be motivated to maintain and protect them. However, even participatory approaches, such as community-based forest management, may not always result in clear positive outcomes for involvement in decision making and forest conservation. We examine whether an Indonesian government initiative for community-based forest management was positively associated with community members' participation in local decision making and support for conservation and sustainable management of forest resources, in the context of state-owned lands. We used household questionnaire data to compare villages with and without a community forest, and community forests over time in a case study region of West Kalimantan. Analyzing forest visitations, conservation support, and indicators of procedural equity, we found no consistent association between having a community forest and higher levels of participation in decision making or household support for forest conservation. However, well-being indicators were positively associated with more active participation. The level of support for forest conservation was also positively related to households' leadership in village institutions and higher levels of well-being, particularly subjective well-being, land tenure, and material wealth. These social-demographic factors are important considerations when designing and implementing community-based forest management, which strives for fair and just decision-making processes along with forest conservation. The findings highlight how existing socioeconomic contexts factor into local institutions, and that accounting for these in program design and implementation may help address existing social inequalities that influence achieving joint social and ecological objectives.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: community-based forest management, conservation, environmental decision making, Indonesia, participation, social equity
Subjects: S Agriculture > SD Forestry
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Agriculture, Health & Environment Department
Last Modified: 02 Oct 2020 10:32
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
Selected for REF2021: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/29593

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics