Skip navigation

Barriers to the uptake and implementation of natural flood management: a social‐ecological analysis

Barriers to the uptake and implementation of natural flood management: a social‐ecological analysis

Wells, Josh ORCID: 0000-0001-7729-5589, Labadz, Jillian C., Smith, Amanda and Islam, Md. Mofakkarul (2019) Barriers to the uptake and implementation of natural flood management: a social‐ecological analysis. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 13 (S1):e12561. ISSN 1753-318X (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12561)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
28798 ISLAM_Barriers_To_The_Uptake_And_implementation_Of_Natural_Flood_Management_(OA)_2019.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Natural flood management (NFM) is increasingly promoted as a sustainable flood risk management (FRM) option, but significant barriers remain to its implementation. We assess the barriers to uptake and implementation of NFM using an approach in which we conceptualise a catchment as a social‐ecological system. We investigate the barriers relating to multiple stakeholders, biophysical, and social components and the interactions between these different system elements. Semi‐structured interviews were undertaken with land managers and practitioners of FRM in the United Kingdom. Data were analysed using qualitative methods, including thematic coding and categorisation. Key barriers of 25 identified were: economic constraints for land managers, the current lack of scientific evidence to support NFM and current lack of governance over long‐term responsibility for NFM, which hinders future monitoring and maintenance. Practitioners within some sectors were less likely to recognise barriers noted by land managers, including cultural challenges, catchment planning concerns, and lack of perceived control. For successful wider implementation of NFM, it is crucial that practitioners recognise the barriers that land managers experience, and that projects should build monitoring programmes into their funding bids, to assess impacts on flood risk and maintenance needs and to build the evidence base to guide future NFM implementation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: barriers, flood risk management, governance, natural flood management, social-ecological system
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Livelihoods & Institutions Department
Last Modified: 13 Jul 2020 11:32
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
Selected for REF2021: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/28798

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics