Skip navigation

A comparison between powder flow property testers

A comparison between powder flow property testers

Salehi, Hamid, Barletta, Diego and Poletto, Massimo (2017) A comparison between powder flow property testers. Particuology, 32. pp. 10-20. ISSN 1674-2001 (doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2016.08.003)

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

In this work, three different shear testers—the Jenike shear cell tester, the Schulze ring shear tester, and the Brookfield powder flow tester—were compared in terms of the raw shear stress time series, yield loci points, angle of internal friction, cohesion, and unconfined yield strength. The three different powders of dolomitic lime, calcium lactate, and calcium carbonate were used for these comparisons. These three powders were characterized into different flowability classes using the Jenike classification, wherein dolomitic lime falls into the cohesive range, calcium lactate falls into the free-flowing range, and calcium carbonate falls into the very cohesive range. Results showed that the best agreement between the testers was found with moderately cohesive powders such as dolomitic lime. Furthermore, the free-flowing material tends to produce more consistent data between the three testers in terms of shear stresses and yield loci. It should be noted that the pre-shear data of free-flowing powder obtained by the Jenike shear cell must be appropriately interpreted. The largest differences between the testers are found with calcium carbonate, which is a highly compressible powder. The ways in which a high powder compressibility can differently affect the results obtained with the different testers were discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: powder flow property, shear tester, flowability, jenike tester, schulze tester, brookfield powder flow tester
Subjects: T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > School of Engineering (ENN)
Last Modified: 28 Oct 2019 09:51
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/25501

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item