Skip navigation

Economic evaluations of guideline-based care for chronic wounds: a systematic review

Economic evaluations of guideline-based care for chronic wounds: a systematic review

Cheng, Qinglu, Graves, Nicholas and Pacella, Rosana E. ORCID: 0000-0002-9742-1957 (2018) Economic evaluations of guideline-based care for chronic wounds: a systematic review. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 16 (5). pp. 633-651. ISSN 1175-5652 (Print), 1179-1896 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0403-9)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
25451 PACELLA_Economic_Evaluations_of Guideline-Based_Care_for_Chronic_Wounds_2018.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (545kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to review all published economic evaluations of guideline-based care for chronic wounds and to assess how useful these studies are for decision making in health services.

Methods:

Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) were searched on April 16th, 2018. We included studies that evaluated the economic impact and health outcomes associated with implementing evidence-based guidelines as a bundle of care for the prevention and/or treatment of chronic wounds. Information was extracted from each eligible study and organized by the type of chronic wound. The quality of published economic evaluation studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS).

Results:

A total of 24 economic evaluation studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 12 applied decision analytic models. The compliance with the CHEERS checklist ranged between 43 and 83%.

Limitations:

We may have missed some economic evaluation studies despite the use of broad search terms. The quality assessment was conducted based on judgment. Using the CHEERS checklist may reflect the way evaluations were reported rather than conducted.

Conclusions and Implications of Key Findings:

We found that guideline-based care may be cost-saving or cost-effective in most circumstances. The quality and usefulness of reviewed studies for decision making were variable. Better information and higher-quality economic evaluations will increase decision makers’ confidence to promote guideline-based care.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: economic evaluations, systematic review, chronic wounds
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
R Medicine > RL Dermatology
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Education & Health
Last Modified: 08 Oct 2019 11:44
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/25451

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics