Skip navigation

Landlord's duty to mitigate - Should Reichman be revisited?

Landlord's duty to mitigate - Should Reichman be revisited?

Pawlowski, Mark ORCID: 0000-0002-5473-5809 (2018) Landlord's duty to mitigate - Should Reichman be revisited? Landlord and Tenant Review, 22 (5). pp. 171-174. ISSN 1365-8018

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

The article reflects on the outcome of Reichman v Beveridge (2006) EWCA Civ 1659, (CA) which considered whether a landlord seeking recovery of rent arrears from a tenant who has abandoned the premises is required to mitigate his loss. Reviews the range of authorities which the court failed to consider, including Rainey Bros Ltd v Kearney (1990) NI 18, (CA (NI)), and discusses whether the judgment in Reichman was correct.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: tenancy, premises, abandonment, damages, future loss, mitigation, rent arrears
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences > School of Law & Criminology (LAC)
Related URLs:
Last Modified: 08 Jan 2019 11:28
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
Selected for REF2021: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/21870

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item