Skip navigation

Farmers' perceptions on mechanical weeders for rice production in sub-Saharan Africa

Farmers' perceptions on mechanical weeders for rice production in sub-Saharan Africa

Johnson, Jean-Martial, Rodenburg, Jonne ORCID: 0000-0001-9059-9253, Tanka, Atsuko, Senthilkumar, Kalimuthu, Ahouanton, Kokou, Dieng, Ibnou, Klotoe, Agossou, Akakpo, Cyriaque, Segda, Zachary, Yameogo, Louis P., Gbakatchetche, Henri, Acheampong, George E K., Bam, Ralph K., Bakare, Oladele S., Kalisa, Alain, Gasore, Elie R., Ani, Sékou, Ablede, Komlan and Saito, Kazuki (2018) Farmers' perceptions on mechanical weeders for rice production in sub-Saharan Africa. Experimental Agriculture, 55 (1). pp. 117-131. ISSN 0014-4797 (Print), 1469-4441 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447971700059X)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
19024 RODENBURG_Farmers_Perceptions_on_Mechanical_Weeders_2018.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (779kB) | Preview

Abstract

Competition from weeds is one of the major biophysical constraints to rice (Oryza spp.) production in sub-Saharan Africa. Smallholder rice farmers require efficient, affordable and labour-saving weed management technologies. Mechanical weeders have shown to fit this profile. Several mechanical weeder types exist but little is known about locally specific differences in performance and farmer preference between these types. Three to six different weeder types were evaluated at 10 different sites across seven countries – i.e., Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda and Togo. A total of 310 farmers (173 male, 137 female) tested the weeders, scored them for their preference, and compared them with their own weed management practices. In a follow-up study, 186 farmers from Benin and Nigeria received the ring hoe, which was the most preferred in these two countries, to use it during the entire crop growing season. Farmers were surveyed on their experiences. The probability of the ring hoe having the highest score among the tested weeders was 71%. The probability of farmers’ preference of the ring hoe over their usual practices – i.e., herbicide, traditional hoe and hand weeding – was 52, 95 and 91%, respectively. The preference of this weeder was not related to gender, years of experience with rice cultivation, rice field size, weed infestation level, water status or soil texture. In the follow-up study, 80% of farmers who used the ring hoe indicated that weeding time was reduced by at least 31%. Of the farmers testing the ring hoe in the follow-up study, 35% used it also for other crops such as vegetables, maize, sorghum, cassava and millet. These results suggest that the ring hoe offers a gender-neutral solution for reducing labour for weeding in rice as well as other crops and that it is compatible with a wide range of environments. The implications of our findings and challenges for out-scaling of mechanical weeders are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: weeds, rice, mechanical weeders, Africa, farmers
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Agriculture, Health & Environment Department
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Ecosystem Services Research Group
Last Modified: 18 Feb 2019 12:45
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/19024

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics