Skip navigation

Assessment of full life-cycle air emissions of alternative shipping fuels

Assessment of full life-cycle air emissions of alternative shipping fuels

Gilbert, Paul, Walsh, Conor ORCID: 0000-0003-4829-2754, Traut, Michael, Kesieme, Uchenna, Pazouki, Kayvan and Murphy, Alan (2017) Assessment of full life-cycle air emissions of alternative shipping fuels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172. pp. 855-866. ISSN 0959-6526 (doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.165)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Publisher's PDF - Open Access)
17953 WALSH_Assessment_of_Full_Life-Cycle_Air_Emissions_(OA)_2017.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
17953 WALSH_Assessment_of_Full_Life-Cycle_Air_Emissions_(AAM)_2017.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

There is a need for alternative fuels in the shipping sector for two main motivations: to deliver a reduction in local pollutants and comply with existing regulation; and to mitigate climate change and cut greenhouse gas emissions. However, any alternative fuel must meet a range of criteria to become a viable option. Key among them is the requirement that it can deliver emissions reductions over its full life-cycle. For a set of fuels, comprising both conventional and alternative fuels, together with associated production pathways, this paper presents a life-cycle assessment with respect to six emissions species: local pollutants sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter; and greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. While the analysis demonstrates that no widely available fuel exists currently to deliver on both motivations, some alternative fuel options have the potential, if key barriers can be overcome. Hydrogen or other synthetic fuels rely on decarbonisation of both energy input to production and other feedstock materials to deliver reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Similarly, bio-derived fuels can be an abatement option, but only if it can be ensured that land-use change whilst growing biomass does not impact wider potential savings and the sector is able to compete sufficiently for their use. These examples show that crucial barriers are located upstream in the respective fuel life-cycle and that the way to overcome them may reside beyond the scope of the shipping sector alone.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Uncontrolled Keywords: Climate change, Shipping, Emissions, Lifecycle assessment, Fuel
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Agriculture, Health & Environment Department
Last Modified: 08 Nov 2017 15:43
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/17953

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics