Azizpour, Hooshyar, Galea, Edwin R. ORCID: 0000-0002-0001-6665, Erlanda, Sveinung, Batalden, Bjørn-Morten, Deere, Steven ORCID: 0000-0001-5171-2014 and Oltedal, Helle (2023) Factors influencing the time required to don thermal protective immersion suits correctly. Safety Science, 164:106064. ISSN 0925-7535 (doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106064)

Preview	PDF (Open Access Article) 39291 GALEA_Factors_Influencing_The_Time_Required_To_Don_Suits_Correctly_(OA)_2023.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (5MB) | Preview
	PDF (This is the uncorrected proof version of the Donning paper to appear in Safety Science.) pagination_SAFETY_106064 (5).pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB) | Request a copy
Preview	PDF (This is the SM for the donning paper to appear in Safety Science) 20221123_3_Manuscript of the SM.pdf - Supplemental Material Download (809kB) | Preview

Abstract

The cold environment in polar regions introduces additional challenges when abandoning passenger vessels and offshore facilities. The International Maritime Organization Polar Code requires vessels operating in polar regions to be equipped with approved thermal protective immersion suits (TPIS) that can be donned unassisted within 120 s. As time is critical during an evacuation, quantifying the Net Donning Time (NDT) is important as this may need to be factored into passenger ship evacuation analysis. Furthermore, an incorrectly donned TPIS may be ineffective in providing the required thermal protection, so in addition to NDT, it is important to understand the factors that impact donning correctness. In this study, we present the results of a series of trials that quantified participants' performance while donning a TPIS with integrated buoyancy. Analysis of data from 108 participants revealed that NDT ranged from 65 to 341 s, with over 90 % requiring a total donning time of greater than 120 s. The mean NDT was dependent on a complex relationship between, age (increases by 6.6 % for each 10 years), gender (increases by 33 % if female), experience (decreases by 17 % with experience), method of instruction (increases by 21 % with video instruction) and failure to remove shoes (increases by 26 %). Furthermore, the method of instruction significantly impacted the number of donning errors, with instruction by video producing an average of 1.5 errors while written instruction producing 2.3. Finally, a donning time distribution is suggested for use in evacuation modelling analysis.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	survival suit, donning time, correctness, evacuation, polar waters, passenger ship, ship evacuation
Subjects:	T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) V Naval Science > V Naval Science (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Engineering & Science Faculty of Engineering & Science > Centre for Numerical Modelling & Process Analysis (CNMPA) Faculty of Engineering & Science > Centre for Numerical Modelling & Process Analysis (CNMPA) > Fire Safety Engineering Group (FSEG) Faculty of Engineering & Science > School of Computing & Mathematical Sciences (CMS)
Last Modified:	02 Jun 2023 08:03
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/39291

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads