Skip navigation

Who victimizes whom and who defends whom? A multivariate social network analysis of victimization, aggression, and defending in early childhood

Who victimizes whom and who defends whom? A multivariate social network analysis of victimization, aggression, and defending in early childhood

Huitsing, Gijs and Monks, Claire P. ORCID: 0000-0003-2638-181X (2018) Who victimizes whom and who defends whom? A multivariate social network analysis of victimization, aggression, and defending in early childhood. Aggressive Behavior, 44 (4). pp. 394-405. ISSN 0096-140X (Print), 1098-2337 (Online) (doi:10.1002/ab.21760)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Publisher's PDF - Open Access)
19395 MONKS_Who_Victimises_Whom_&_Who_Defends_Whom_(OA)_2018.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (728kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
19395 MONKS_Who_Victimizes_Whom_and_Who_Defends_Whom_2018.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (174kB) | Preview

Abstract

The aim of this research was to investigate the interplay between victim-aggressor relationships and defending relationships in early childhood to test the proposition that young aggressors are less selective than older children in their choice of vulnerable targets. Cross-sectional multivariate statistical social network analyses (Exponential Random Graph Models) for a sample of 177 preschoolers from seven classes, 5- to 7-years-old, revealed that boys were more aggressive than girls, towards both boys and girls, whereas defending relationships were most often same-sex. There was significant reciprocity in aggression, indicating that it was more often bidirectional rather than unidirectional. In addition, aggressors clearly defended each other when they shared their targets of aggression, whereas a marginally significant trend appeared for defending between victims who were victimized by the same aggressors. Furthermore, teacher-rated dominance was positively associated with children’s involvement in both aggression and victimization, and teacher-rated insecurity was associated with less aggression, but not with victimization. These findings suggest that those who are reported as being victimized may retaliate, or be aggressive themselves, and do not display some of the vulnerabilities reported among older groups of victims. The findings are in line with the proposition that young aggressors are less strategic than older children in targeting vulnerable victims. The network approach to peer victimization and defending contributes to understanding the social processes facilitating the development of aggression in early childhood.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2018 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Aggression; Defending; Early childhood; Social networks; Victimization.
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Architecture, Computing & Humanities
Faculty of Architecture, Computing & Humanities > Applied Sociology Research Group
Faculty of Architecture, Computing & Humanities > Department of History, Politics & Social Sciences
Last Modified: 13 Jul 2018 13:32
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: GREAT a
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/19395

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics