Skip navigation

Disease-specific training in Parkinson's disease for care assistants: a comparison of interactive and self-study methods

Disease-specific training in Parkinson's disease for care assistants: a comparison of interactive and self-study methods

Axelrod, Lesley, Bryan, Karen ORCID: 0000-0003-0742-1193, Gage, Heather, Kaye, Julie, Ting, Sharlene, Williams, Peter, Trend, Patrick and Wade, Derick (2011) Disease-specific training in Parkinson's disease for care assistants: a comparison of interactive and self-study methods. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26 (6). pp. 545-557. ISSN 0269-2155 (Print), 1477-0873 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511426161)

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objective:
To compare two approaches to providing training to care assistants in Parkinson’s disease.

Design:
Pragmatic parallel arm controlled trial.

Setting:
Training either by an interactive training day at a local medical education establishment or self study.

Subjects:
Care assistants recruited from local health and social care providers

Interventions:
The content of both interventions was similar, covering causes, symptoms, diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, multidisciplinary management, mobility, communication, swallowing, and involving 5 hours of study time.

Main measures:
Knowledge about Parkinson’s (assessed by true/false quizzes and identifying ‘four facts’ about Parkinson’s) immediately post training and six weeks later; views on training methods of care assistants and employers/managers.

Results:
Thirty-seven employers nominated 100 care staff who were allocated to interactive training (49) and self study (51). Training completion rates (retained to six-week follow-up) were lower for self study (42.1% vs. 83.7% training day). There were no significant differences between groups on quiz or ‘four facts’ scores at baseline or six-week follow-up. Immediately post training, the self-study group (with access to written materials) had significantly higher quiz scores than the training day group (no access to materials at test). Within-group comparisons showed improvements post training. Although interactive training may be preferred, obtaining release from duties can be problematic.

Conclusions:
Both approaches have similar effects on knowledge of care assistants without prior specific training. Providing a variety of approaches will cater for all preferences. The findings may be generalizable to training the care workforce for other specific roles.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, controlled trial, training
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Vice-Chancellor's Group
Last Modified: 27 Feb 2018 17:24
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/18598

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item