Kaspersson, Maria (2016) Dangerous dogs or dangerous reporting? Dog bite fatalities in the news. In: British Society of Criminology Conference, 6-8 July 2016, Nottingham Conference Centre. (Unpublished)

Preview

PDF (PowerPoint Presentation) 15859 KASPERSSON_Dangerous_Dogs_2016.pdf - Presentation Download (971kB) | Preview

Abstract

Dog bite fatalities are uncommon in the UK, and therefore tend to be reported. Galtung (1998) states that we live not so much in an information society, as in a ‘disinformation’ society and media are often responsible for this disinformation. Issues regarding dogs, dog bites and 'dangerous' dogs (or, 'status' or 'weapon' dogs) discussed in news media means the main source of information available to the public is shaped by reporting practices. Due to fragmented reporting within a framework of newsworthiness, the context, underlying causes and issues of prevention are not discussed. This paper will study the reporting of 22 dog bite fatalities since 2003 and how reporting practices result in what can be called disinformation. It will not be argued that this disinformation is consciously done, but rather the result of concentrating on certain (newsworthy) issues – such as breed and the Dangerous Dogs Act and its implementation and shortcomings – and ignoring others – such as child and animal care. Without news reports identifying and analysing the common factors in these cases, future incidents will not be prevented and people will not know what can be done to stop them.

Item Type:	Conference or Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Dog bites; news reporting, frame analysis, retrospective interpretation
Subjects:	K Law > KD England and Wales
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences > School of Law & Criminology (LAC)
Related URLs:	Organisation
Last Modified:	06 Oct 2016 09:42
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/15859

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads