Skip navigation

Characterising food insecurity in pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Uganda using a consumption coping strategy index

Characterising food insecurity in pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Uganda using a consumption coping strategy index

Mayanja, Maureen N., Rubaire-Akiiki, Chris, Greiner, Ted and Morton, John F. (2015) Characterising food insecurity in pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Uganda using a consumption coping strategy index. Pastoralism, 5 (11). pp. 1-14. ISSN 2041-7136 (Print), 2041-7136 (Online) (doi:10.1186/s13570-015-0031-z)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Publisher's PDF (Gold Open Access))
14364_MORTON_Characterising_Food_Insecurity_2015.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (731kB)

Abstract

We explore the utility of a consumption coping strategy index (CSI) in characterising and assessing the factors influencing household food insecurity. We assessed 53 pastoral and 197 agro-pastoral households in Nakasongola and Nakaseke districts of Uganda, examining the use of 27 consumption coping strategies over a recall time of two 30-day periods, one at the start of a dry season in 2012 and one at the start of a rainy season in 2013.

Four categorical food insecurity status measures were established - food secure (CSI 0 to 5) and mildly (CSI 6 to 20), moderately (CSI 21 to 42) and extremely (CSI >42) food insecure. For the dry season, the mean CSI was 29.4 ± 2.59 and 33.6 % of households were food secure, while for the rains, mean CSI was 33.1 ± 2.30 and 14.0 % of households were food secure. The combination of livelihood system, land holdings, number of livestock owned and belonging to a social network explained 9.4 % to 10 % of the variance in household food insecurity for agro-pastoralists, but variance for pastoralists was not explained by these factors. While the only highly significant factor associated with increasing household food insecurity in the dry season was low landholdings, in the rainy season, it was pastoral livelihood, low livestock holdings for agro-pastoralists and non-involvement in social networks.

While our model identified a number of factors important in describing household food insecurity, it explained only about 10 % of the variance.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2015 Mayanja et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Food insecurity; Consumption coping strategies; Pastoral households; Tropical livestock units
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Development Studies Research Group
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Livelihoods & Institutions Department
Related URLs:
Last Modified: 26 Apr 2018 15:42
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: GREAT a
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/14364

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics